0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Nuke (M1)
Records Nuke
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:19s01:30s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:30s01:30s
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
51.6158
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
174.6
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.24.6
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2215.0373
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Tirs (total/round)
10116
Tirs (total/round)
8616
Informations
Map Analysis of Looking For Org vs Mindfreak by the Bo3.gg Team
Looking For Org on Nuke Analysis
Looking For Org demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Looking For Org on Nuke were SaVage, who contributed 29 kills, and sterling, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9885 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Looking For Org held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Mindfreak on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Mindfreak, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Mindfreak on Nuke included tucks, who contributed 14 kills, and supar, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6880 total damage, Mindfreak couldn't prevent Looking For Org from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Mindfreak struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires