Avantages des équipes
Score
6.1
6.2
Anubis-0.4
Manches gagnées
0
0
Anubis0
Éliminations
0
0
Anubis0
Dégâts
0
0
Anubis0
Économie
809.95K
817.1K
Anubis-18700
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
104.4189
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
146.5019
Round rapide (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Round rapide (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Round rapide (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Score du joueur (round)
49761010
Score du joueur (round)
40191010
As du joueur
1
Multikills x-
4
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of LOADING vs Chetz by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LOADING and Chetz, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Dust II, Anubis, and victory was secured by LOADING. The MVP of this match was Jas_x.
LOADING analytics
The team LOADING secured 26 out of 43 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Anubis. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LOADING were Jas_x contributed 33 kills and Razzmo contributed 29 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15354 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LOADING held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Chetz analytics
The team Chetz managed to secure 17 out of 43 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Chetz were Swaggy contributed 31 kills and shateri contributed 32 kills. 16208 of total damage by Chetz could not prevent LOADING from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Chetz struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires