0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
216.4049
Dégâts (total/round)
39673
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
As du joueur
1
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
3
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Inferno
L
44%
Dust II
20%
Vertigo
20%
Anubis
13%
Ancient
11%
Nuke
0%
Mirage
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
100%
1
0
Dust II
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
33%
9
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
56%
9
0
Dust II
20%
5
0
Vertigo
20%
5
0
Anubis
46%
13
0
Ancient
11%
9
0
Nuke
0%
1
2
Mirage
0%
0
2
Informations
Match analysis of LOADING vs ADEPTS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LOADING and ADEPTS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by ADEPTS. The MVP of this match was Chuckyy.
ADEPTS analytics
The team ADEPTS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ADEPTS were Chuckyy contributed 28 kills and Tarkky contributed 28 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11005 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ADEPTS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LOADING analytics
The team LOADING managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LOADING were HippoV contributed 17 kills and Revol contributed 16 kills. 9812 of total damage by LOADING could not prevent ADEPTS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LOADING struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires