0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
6.2
5.6
Dust II0.6
Manches gagnées
16
10
Dust II6
Éliminations
87
81
Dust II6
Dégâts
9.31K
9.2K
Dust II103
Économie
558K
573.85K
Dust II-15850
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Vertigo
42%
Nuke
L
42%
Ancient
38%
Mirage
L
29%
Dust II
L
13%
Inferno
13%
Overpass
L
13%
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
33%
3
0
Nuke
67%
18
0
Ancient
0%
0
3
Mirage
67%
3
4
Dust II
50%
8
1
Inferno
33%
3
2
Overpass
60%
5
2
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
75%
4
5
Nuke
25%
8
9
Ancient
38%
24
0
Mirage
38%
21
2
Dust II
37%
19
8
Inferno
46%
28
6
Overpass
47%
15
1
Informations
Match analysis of LF0 vs Lilmix by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LF0 and Lilmix, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by LF0. The MVP of this match was lesswill.
LF0 analytics
The team LF0 secured 26 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LF0 were lesswill contributed 24 kills and SP1NT contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9307 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LF0 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lilmix analytics
The team Lilmix managed to secure 0 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lilmix were Jackinho contributed 20 kills and bq contributed 18 kills. 9204 of total damage by Lilmix could not prevent LF0 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lilmix struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires