0 Commentaires
60
77
16
-17
283
15:11
12
0
Overpass5.7
-4%
Avantages des équipes
Score
5.5
5.7
Overpass-0.2
Manches gagnées
16
10
Overpass6
Éliminations
94
66
Overpass28
Dégâts
10.02K
7.37K
Overpass2650
Économie
537.15K
381.9K
Overpass155250
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
70%
Overpass
L
56%
Inferno
50%
Mirage
L
40%
Dust II
20%
Nuke
17%
Vertigo
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
0%
0
1
Overpass
100%
3
1
Inferno
0%
0
2
Mirage
100%
1
3
Dust II
0%
3
1
Nuke
58%
12
0
Vertigo
0%
3
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
70%
10
0
Overpass
44%
9
1
Inferno
50%
6
0
Mirage
60%
10
0
Dust II
20%
5
1
Nuke
75%
4
3
Vertigo
0%
2
2
Informations
Match analysis of LF0 vs HOTU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LF0 and HOTU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by LF0. The MVP of this match was mizu.
LF0 analytics
The team LF0 secured 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LF0 were lesswill contributed 19 kills and SP1NT contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8360 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LF0 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HOTU analytics
The team HOTU managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HOTU were mizu contributed 20 kills and casE contributed 19 kills. 7368 of total damage by HOTU could not prevent LF0 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HOTU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires