0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
103
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:34s01:28s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:35s01:28s
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.93.8
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.92
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2315.0791
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8115
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8115
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
23.55.6
Tirs (total/round)
8416
Informations
Map Analysis of Legacy vs 9 Pandas by the Bo3.gg Team
9 Pandas on Inferno Analysis
9 Pandas demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for 9 Pandas on Inferno were seized, who contributed 25 kills, and glowiing, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8887 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, 9 Pandas held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Legacy on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Legacy, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Legacy on Inferno included latto, who contributed 23 kills, and dumau, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9214 total damage, Legacy couldn't prevent 9 Pandas from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Legacy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires