0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M1)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Vertigo
100%
Ancient
100%
Mirage
57%
Overpass
50%
Inferno
40%
Dust II
24%
Nuke
17%
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
100%
1
1
Ancient
100%
1
1
Mirage
100%
1
1
Overpass
0%
2
1
Inferno
60%
10
0
Dust II
43%
7
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
0%
2
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Mirage
43%
7
0
Overpass
50%
4
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Dust II
67%
6
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- gpggg
- pppgg
Informations
Map Analysis of Lausanne SE vs Lostik by the Bo3.gg Team
Lostik on Inferno Analysis
Lostik demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 25 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Lostik on Inferno were FleiVa-s, who contributed 23 kills, and flaze, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10169 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Lostik held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Lausanne SE on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Lausanne SE, as they managed to secure 0 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Lausanne SE on Inferno included MERISINHO, who contributed 23 kills, and S3NSEY, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7401 total damage, Lausanne SE couldn't prevent Lostik from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Lausanne SE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires