0 Commentaires
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:32s01:28s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:34s01:28s
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
13.23.8
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
63.825.4
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
126.7456
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
62.125.4
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
126.7456
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
66.325.4
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.84.6
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8115
Informations
Map Analysis of KZG vs Mindfreak by the Bo3.gg Team
Mindfreak on Anubis Analysis
Mindfreak demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Mindfreak on Anubis were tucks, who contributed 18 kills, and dangeR, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7073 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Mindfreak held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
KZG on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for KZG, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for KZG on Anubis included KZXL, who contributed 22 kills, and Hassie, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6411 total damage, KZG couldn't prevent Mindfreak from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, KZG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires