Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.73.8
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
166.5798
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
63.121.6
Éliminations avec cocktails Molotov en moyenne par carte
21.0849
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
8.92
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.616
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
57.825.3
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
113.4
Score du joueur (round)
37651012
Score du joueur (round)
37531012
Informations
Map Analysis of Kappa Bar vs DREAM by the Bo3.gg Team
DREAM on Inferno Analysis
DREAM demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for DREAM on Inferno were zibron, who contributed 24 kills, and Vaegten, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10345 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, DREAM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Kappa Bar on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Kappa Bar, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Kappa Bar on Inferno included Karma, who contributed 16 kills, and zeak, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7321 total damage, Kappa Bar couldn't prevent DREAM from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Kappa Bar struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires