0 Commentaires
74
71
27
+3
370
9:11
21
2
0%
avantage aux équipes Dust II (M1)
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
5828
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
6728
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
7428
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.64.8
Score du joueur (round)
35191010
Score du joueur (round)
45801010
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Informations
Map Analysis of Johnny Speeds vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team
kONO on Dust II Analysis
kONO demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for kONO on Dust II were amster, who contributed 22 kills, and byr9, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8509 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, kONO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Johnny Speeds on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Johnny Speeds, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Johnny Speeds on Dust II included spooke, who contributed 17 kills, and draken, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8414 total damage, Johnny Speeds couldn't prevent kONO from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Johnny Speeds struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires