0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
76%
Ancient
47%
Overpass
34%
Vertigo
29%
Nuke
23%
Dust II
19%
Inferno
19%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
76%
29
1
Ancient
0%
1
31
Overpass
67%
12
16
Vertigo
46%
13
9
Nuke
17%
12
9
Dust II
69%
29
1
Inferno
54%
28
3
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
0%
5
6
Ancient
47%
15
5
Overpass
33%
3
7
Vertigo
75%
8
1
Nuke
40%
15
0
Dust II
50%
4
8
Inferno
35%
20
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pgpgg
- gpggp
Informations
Match analysis of Iron Branch vs Conquer by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Iron Branch and Conquer, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Inferno, Vertigo, Overpass, and victory was secured by Iron Branch. The MVP of this match was LYNXi.
Iron Branch analytics
The team Iron Branch secured 0 out of 68 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Iron Branch were sad contributed 54 kills and MaSvAl contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26357 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Iron Branch held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Conquer analytics
The team Conquer managed to secure 68 out of 68 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 10 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Conquer were LYNXi contributed 57 kills and Choco contributed 50 kills. 25664 of total damage by Conquer could not prevent Iron Branch from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Conquer struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 34 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires