0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M1)
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4398
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
12.13.8
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
41.6964
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.83.8
Score du joueur (round)
39881012
Tirs (total/round)
10616
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of Into the Breach vs GODSENT by the Bo3.gg Team
Into the Breach on Anubis Analysis
Into the Breach demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Into the Breach on Anubis were CRUC1AL, who contributed 18 kills, and rallen, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7486 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Into the Breach held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GODSENT on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for GODSENT, as they managed to secure 2 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GODSENT on Anubis included RuStY, who contributed 14 kills, and Plopski, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5020 total damage, GODSENT couldn't prevent Into the Breach from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, GODSENT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires