0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
13.63.4
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
57.725.3
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
156.732
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
61.725.3
Score du joueur (round)
50981012
Score du joueur (round)
35191012
Score du joueur (round)
35631012
Dégâts (total/round)
50073
Score du joueur (round)
51541012
As du joueur
1
Informations
Map Analysis of Into the Breach vs AVANGAR by the Bo3.gg Team
Into the Breach on Inferno Analysis
Into the Breach demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 17 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Into the Breach on Inferno were CYPHER, who contributed 19 kills, and Thomas, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10060 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Into the Breach held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
AVANGAR on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for AVANGAR, as they managed to secure 7 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for AVANGAR on Inferno included icy, who contributed 19 kills, and FinigaN, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7872 total damage, AVANGAR couldn't prevent Into the Breach from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, AVANGAR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires