0 Commentaires
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
64.916.3
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
10.23.6
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8164
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
28.25.9
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
17.95.9
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
154.8
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
22.65.9
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8164
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
16.95.9
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Informations
Map Analysis of Insilio vs Permitta by the Bo3.gg Team
Insilio on Anubis Analysis
Insilio demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Insilio on Anubis were FpSSS, who contributed 20 kills, and Polt, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8253 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Insilio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Permitta on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Permitta, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Permitta on Anubis included tomiko, who contributed 18 kills, and mASKED, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6506 total damage, Permitta couldn't prevent Insilio from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Permitta struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires