0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
113
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:35s01:28s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:25s01:28s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:31s01:28s
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
126.7456
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
63.325.4
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4398
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
14.83.8
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1715.0791
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
126.7456
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of Insilio vs GUN5 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Insilio and GUN5, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by GUN5. The MVP of this match was FinigaN.
GUN5 analytics
The team GUN5 secured 43 out of 68 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Nuke. They also successfully set 10 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GUN5 were FinigaN contributed 60 kills and lov1kus contributed 60 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 27815 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GUN5 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Insilio analytics
The team Insilio managed to secure 25 out of 68 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Insilio were FpSSS contributed 46 kills and Pipw contributed 44 kills. 20684 of total damage by Insilio could not prevent GUN5 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Insilio struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires