0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Pourcentage de tirs à la tête
40%15%
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.34.6
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
136.7456
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
97.525.4
Éliminations en moyenne par carte
2117.5592
Dégâts en moyenne (par tour)
151.51940.7
Tirs à la tête en moyenne par carte
13.950.3103
Score du joueur (round)
35191012
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:18s00:05s
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of IKLA vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team
IKLA on Inferno Analysis
IKLA demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for IKLA on Inferno were Kvem, who contributed 21 kills, and MICHU, who added 12 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 6192 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, IKLA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Sangal on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sangal, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Sangal on Inferno included PANIX, who contributed 11 kills, and kyuubii, who added 6 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4396 total damage, Sangal couldn't prevent IKLA from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires