0 Commentaires
89
104
22
-15
347
8:21
22
3
-7%
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M2)
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:27s01:30s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:35s01:30s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:35s01:30s
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
14.63.8
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3315.0371
Dégâts (total/round)
42273
Score du joueur (round)
36361012
Score du joueur (round)
41151012
Score du joueur (round)
37871012
Score du joueur (round)
36341012
Informations
Map Analysis of IKLA vs Iron Branch by the Bo3.gg Team
IKLA on Anubis Analysis
IKLA demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for IKLA on Anubis were s4ltovsk1yy, who contributed 26 kills, and Kvem, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 11270 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, IKLA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Iron Branch on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Iron Branch, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Iron Branch on Anubis included sad, who contributed 25 kills, and MaSvAl, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10073 total damage, Iron Branch couldn't prevent IKLA from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Iron Branch struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires