0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
114.491
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
31.6074
Round rapide (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
50%
Anubis
50%
Ancient
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
50%
2
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
0%
2
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ppgpp
- ppg
Informations
Match analysis of HyperSpirit vs PeeP by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HyperSpirit and PeeP, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by HyperSpirit. The MVP of this match was GEOHYPE.
HyperSpirit analytics
The team HyperSpirit secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HyperSpirit were GEOHYPE contributed 19 kills and swiiffter contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7792 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HyperSpirit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PeeP analytics
The team PeeP managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PeeP were h1KaNNN contributed 13 kills and YumsaN contributed 10 kills. 6091 of total damage by PeeP could not prevent HyperSpirit from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PeeP struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires