0 Commentaires
79
34
19
+45
467
13:4
21
3
+33%
avantage aux équipes Nuke (M2)
Records Nuke
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
113
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:25s01:30s
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
41.3055
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
20.33.4
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
7.52
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:09s00:39s
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
103.6448
Dégâts avec M4A4 en moyenne (par tour)
56.312.7
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
16.14.6
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
7.12
Informations
Map Analysis of HAVU vs Copenhagen Flames by the Bo3.gg Team
Copenhagen Flames on Nuke Analysis
Copenhagen Flames demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 15 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Nuke were TMB, who contributed 19 kills, and regali, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 7938 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
HAVU on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for HAVU, as they managed to secure 2 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for HAVU on Nuke included Spargo, who contributed 10 kills, and zehN, who added 7 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4627 total damage, HAVU couldn't prevent Copenhagen Flames from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires