0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:28s01:24s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:35s01:24s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:32s01:24s
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.33.4
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
18.86
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
21.3011
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
10.13.6
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
21.3011
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
12.43.6
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1614.3232
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of GTZ vs NeverPlay by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GTZ and NeverPlay, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, and victory was secured by GTZ. The MVP of this match was Icarus.
GTZ analytics
The team GTZ secured 26 out of 37 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GTZ were Icarus contributed 43 kills and Shr contributed 32 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15573 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GTZ held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NeverPlay analytics
The team NeverPlay managed to secure 11 out of 37 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 7 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NeverPlay were mS contributed 33 kills and opdust contributed 17 kills. 11633 of total damage by NeverPlay could not prevent GTZ from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NeverPlay struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires