0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Ancient (M1)
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
A
100%
Inferno
A
50%
Anubis
34%
Nuke
25%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Mirage
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
0%
6
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Anubis
67%
3
0
Nuke
25%
4
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
2
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
100%
1
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Anubis
33%
3
0
Nuke
0%
0
3
Overpass
0%
0
3
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Mirage
0%
0
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- gpppp
- gpp
Informations
Map Analysis of GTZ vs AL QATRAO by the Bo3.gg Team
AL QATRAO on Ancient Analysis
AL QATRAO demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for AL QATRAO on Ancient were hdstr, who contributed 19 kills, and Icarus, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 7676 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, AL QATRAO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GTZ on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for GTZ, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GTZ on Ancient included MattyMDaKing, who contributed 12 kills, and c0mplex, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5471 total damage, GTZ couldn't prevent AL QATRAO from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, GTZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires