GR Tableau des résultats Inferno (M1)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

15

14

6

+1

86

3:0

3

0

7.0

+9%

15

15

3

0

70

2:5

3

1

5.9

+1%

9

13

3

-4

58

0:0

2

0

5.1

-15%

12

13

3

-1

67

1:5

3

0

5.0

-4%

7

18

3

-11

38

2:3

1

1

4.1

+7%

Total

58

73

18

-15

319

8:13

12

2

5.4

0%

ATOX Tableau des résultats Inferno (M1)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

21

11

3

+10

97

3:1

7

1

7.8

+28%

19

12

6

+7

102

3:3

6

0

7.5

+30%

13

12

5

+1

72

4:2

2

0

6.1

0%

12

10

5

+2

58

2:1

2

0

5.8

-3%

8

13

5

-5

59

1:1

1

0

5.1

-20%

Total

73

58

24

+15

387

13:8

18

1

6.5

+7%

avantage aux équipes Inferno (M1)
Informations
Map Analysis of GR vs ATOX by the Bo3.gg Team

ATOX on Inferno Analysis

ATOX demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ATOX on Inferno were kabal, who contributed 21 kills, and Zesta, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8133 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, ATOX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


GR on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for GR, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for GR on Inferno included mediocrity, who contributed 15 kills, and weqt2, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6699 total damage, GR couldn't prevent ATOX from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, GR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date