0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.616
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
51.6964
Dégâts avec Desert Eagle en moyenne (par tour)
26.85.4
Leurres lancés en moyenne
41.291
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
61.8064
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
26.25.6
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2315.0371
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
175.6
Dégâts (total/round)
40473
Score du joueur (round)
35341012
Informations
Map Analysis of GODSENT vs O PLANO by the Bo3.gg Team
O PLANO on Inferno Analysis
O PLANO demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for O PLANO on Inferno were vsm, who contributed 24 kills, and leo_drk, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10461 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, O PLANO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GODSENT on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for GODSENT, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GODSENT on Inferno included felps, who contributed 17 kills, and b4rtiN, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8936 total damage, GODSENT couldn't prevent O PLANO from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, GODSENT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires