0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Vertigo (M1)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Inferno
78%
Mirage
e
60%
Anubis
e
35%
Dust II
33%
Ancient
e
13%
Vertigo
e
11%
Nuke
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
78%
9
1
Mirage
40%
10
2
Anubis
48%
29
0
Dust II
33%
3
0
Ancient
47%
19
2
Vertigo
39%
23
0
Nuke
0%
0
5
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
0%
3
2
Mirage
100%
1
3
Anubis
83%
6
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
60%
10
1
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ggppp
- gpggp
Informations
Map Analysis of GL Academy vs esmagaB by the Bo3.gg Team
esmagaB on Vertigo Analysis
esmagaB demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for esmagaB on Vertigo were rafaxF, who contributed 18 kills, and aragornN, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 8434 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, esmagaB held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GL Academy on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for GL Academy, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GL Academy on Vertigo included God6y, who contributed 17 kills, and rud, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8090 total damage, GL Academy couldn't prevent esmagaB from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, GL Academy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires