Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:31s01:30s
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
51.6964
Dégâts avec Desert Eagle en moyenne (par tour)
20.65.4
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
83.6448
Dégâts avec M4A4 en moyenne (par tour)
37.312.7
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
16.23.4
Leurres lancés en moyenne
41.291
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8064
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
16.65.6
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
186.5798
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of Gambit vs Trident by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Gambit and Trident, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, and victory was secured by Gambit. The MVP of this match was Hobbit.
Gambit analytics
The team Gambit secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Gambit were Hobbit contributed 43 kills and Ax1Le contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20137 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Gambit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Trident analytics
The team Trident managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Trident were clax contributed 31 kills and Norwi contributed 30 kills. 14203 of total damage by Trident could not prevent Gambit from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Trident struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires