0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Dust II (M1)
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
216.5798
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
62.621.6
Tirs à la tête (total/carte)
238
Pourcentage de tirs à la tête
38%15%
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
51.6964
Dégâts avec Desert Eagle en moyenne (par tour)
17.75.4
Échanges en moyenne par carte
10.923.5084
Tirs à la tête en moyenne par carte
22.960.3102
Dégâts (total/round)
38373
Score du joueur (round)
42731012
Informations
Map Analysis of Gambit vs Enterprise by the Bo3.gg Team
Enterprise on Dust II Analysis
Enterprise demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Enterprise on Dust II were MATYS, who contributed 26 kills, and The eLiVe, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 11107 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Enterprise held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Gambit on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Gambit, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Gambit on Dust II included sh1ro, who contributed 26 kills, and Ax1Le, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9406 total damage, Gambit couldn't prevent Enterprise from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Gambit struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires