0 Commentaires
Records Ancient
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.43.4
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
15.34.6
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
114.6963
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
53.816.7
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
146.732
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
62.525.3
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2015.0371
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
123.8
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
146.732
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
62.225.3
Informations
Map Analysis of Gambit vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
Gambit on Ancient Analysis
Gambit demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Gambit on Ancient were Ax1Le, who contributed 23 kills, and Hobbit, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 8761 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Gambit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
BIG on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for BIG, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for BIG on Ancient included faveN, who contributed 19 kills, and tabseN, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6727 total damage, BIG couldn't prevent Gambit from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires