0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
334.7
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
23.54.7
Pourcentage de tirs à la tête
100%15%
Pourcentage de tirs à la tête
80%15%
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
11.6755
Dégâts avec Desert Eagle en moyenne (par tour)
505.4
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
11.4429
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
283.9
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
26.6606
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
10025.3
Informations
Map Analysis of Galorys vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
Galorys on Inferno Analysis
Galorys demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 2 out of 2 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Galorys on Inferno were detr0ittJ, who contributed 3 kills, and happ, who added 3 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 900 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Galorys held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Sharks on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 0 out of 2 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Sharks on Inferno included togs, who contributed 4 kills, and doc, who added 1 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 582 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent Galorys from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires