0 Commentaires
85
45
19
+40
441
15:5
20
2
+19%
avantage aux équipes Mirage (M3)
Records Mirage
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
226.5798
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
87.521.6
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
126.732
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.83.8
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
14.34.6
Éliminations en moyenne par carte
3017.5558
Dégâts en moyenne (par tour)
133.11939.7
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Informations
Map Analysis of G2 vs Natus Vincere by the Bo3.gg Team
Natus Vincere on Mirage Analysis
Natus Vincere demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Natus Vincere on Mirage were s1mple, who contributed 30 kills, and electroNic, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 8812 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, Natus Vincere held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
G2 on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for G2, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for G2 on Mirage included AMANEK, who contributed 13 kills, and huNter-, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5043 total damage, G2 couldn't prevent Natus Vincere from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, G2 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires