0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4456
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
41.6672
Assistances en moyenne par carte
114.4098
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Dust II
36%
Anubis
23%
Inferno
11%
Ancient
10%
Vertigo
7%
Mirage
6%
Nuke
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
64%
11
0
Anubis
30%
10
9
Inferno
53%
15
1
Ancient
50%
14
5
Vertigo
55%
11
3
Mirage
52%
21
0
Nuke
0%
0
7
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
100%
1
2
Anubis
53%
15
21
Inferno
42%
19
8
Ancient
60%
42
3
Vertigo
48%
23
8
Mirage
58%
36
1
Nuke
0%
1
37
Informations
Match analysis of DMS vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between DMS and Endpoint, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Endpoint. The MVP of this match was cej0t.
Endpoint analytics
The team Endpoint secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Endpoint were cej0t contributed 20 kills and CRUC1AL contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7949 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DMS analytics
The team DMS managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DMS were kAlash contributed 15 kills and H1te contributed 11 kills. 6293 of total damage by DMS could not prevent Endpoint from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires