Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
75%
Overpass
50%
Nuke
42%
Ancient
33%
Anubis
30%
Vertigo
15%
Dust II
4%
Inferno
4%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
0%
0
27
Overpass
25%
16
13
Nuke
65%
17
2
Ancient
17%
6
11
Anubis
80%
5
1
Vertigo
48%
23
2
Dust II
65%
17
3
Inferno
55%
20
5
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
75%
28
1
Overpass
75%
20
11
Nuke
23%
13
7
Ancient
50%
2
26
Anubis
50%
2
0
Vertigo
33%
9
10
Dust II
61%
23
1
Inferno
59%
32
2
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ggpgp
- pgpgg
Informations
Match analysis of FTW vs Iron Branch by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FTW and Iron Branch, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Anubis, Overpass, and victory was secured by Iron Branch. The MVP of this match was nifee3.
Iron Branch analytics
The team Iron Branch secured 82 out of 82 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Anubis. They also successfully set 14 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Iron Branch were nifee3 contributed 72 kills and MaSvAl contributed 66 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31799 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Iron Branch held their ground firmly, successfully defending 43 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FTW analytics
The team FTW managed to secure 0 out of 82 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FTW were stadodo contributed 48 kills and DDias contributed 59 kills. 27950 of total damage by FTW could not prevent Iron Branch from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FTW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires