0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
12.83.4
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.5972
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
144.9
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
8.22
Tirs à la tête (total/carte)
238
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
156.3792
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
59.625.2
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
61.8162
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
266
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
133.3516
Informations
Map Analysis of Nexus vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team
fnatic on Inferno Analysis
fnatic demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for fnatic on Inferno were MATYS, who contributed 35 kills, and blameF, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9331 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Nexus on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Nexus, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Nexus on Inferno included ragga, who contributed 16 kills, and s0und, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7323 total damage, Nexus couldn't prevent fnatic from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires