0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec Desert Eagle en moyenne (par tour)
16.55.4
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
13.63.8
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
103.6448
Tirs (total/round)
8316
Score du joueur (round)
35091012
Tirs (total/round)
11216
Score du joueur (round)
34721012
Score du joueur (round)
43641012
Tirs (total/round)
10916
Score du joueur (round)
42281012
Informations
Map Analysis of fnatic vs Ninjas in Pyjamas by the Bo3.gg Team
fnatic on Inferno Analysis
fnatic demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for fnatic on Inferno were KRIMZ, who contributed 22 kills, and Brollan, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10548 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Ninjas in Pyjamas on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Ninjas in Pyjamas, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Ninjas in Pyjamas on Inferno included Plopski, who contributed 20 kills, and hampus, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9671 total damage, Ninjas in Pyjamas couldn't prevent fnatic from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Ninjas in Pyjamas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires