1 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.32
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.53.4
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
186.5888
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
68.325.3
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
5729
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1914.6931
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4456
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
134
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of PERA vs FlyQuest by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PERA and FlyQuest, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Mirage, Anubis, and victory was secured by FlyQuest. The MVP of this match was Aaron.
FlyQuest analytics
The team FlyQuest secured 31 out of 63 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Anubis. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FlyQuest were INS contributed 49 kills and aliStair contributed 47 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24616 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FlyQuest held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PERA analytics
The team PERA managed to secure 32 out of 63 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PERA were Aaron contributed 51 kills and Ciocardau contributed 47 kills. 23628 of total damage by PERA could not prevent FlyQuest from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PERA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
1 Commentaires