0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2014.6931
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2214.6931
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
18.33.4
Éliminations avec cocktails Molotov en moyenne par carte
21.0811
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4456
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.52
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Multikills x-
4
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov (total/round)
9523.8
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
13826.4
Informations
Map Analysis of Fluxo vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
Fluxo on Inferno Analysis
Fluxo demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Fluxo on Inferno were chay, who contributed 17 kills, and arT, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7983 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Fluxo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Sharks on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Sharks on Inferno included Gafolo, who contributed 18 kills, and Koala, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6635 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent Fluxo from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires