Vertigo
10 - 13
Anubis
13 - 11
Ancient
16 - 12
FAVBET Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

61

44

14

+17

80

3:3

15

3

Vertigo6.5

6.9

+14%

54

57

22

-3

81

13:11

13

2

Vertigo6.3

6.4

-8%

51

54

18

-3

87

9:8

14

1

Vertigo6.7

6.4

+5%

51

48

10

+3

77

9:6

13

1

Vertigo6

6.2

+6%

52

49

16

+3

72

5:7

13

2

Vertigo5.3

6.1

+4%

Total

269

252

80

+17

397

39:35

68

9

Vertigo6.2

6.4

+4%

Grannys Knockers Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

59

58

16

+1

87

11:15

16

1

Vertigo6.3

6.4

-3%

55

52

14

+3

85

7:5

14

1

Vertigo5.8

6.4

+10%

50

56

16

-6

80

7:6

13

1

Vertigo5.7

6.2

+1%

50

58

13

-8

70

7:7

11

1

Vertigo6.1

5.8

-8%

38

47

12

-9

53

3:6

6

3

Vertigo5.7

5.3

0%

Total

252

271

71

-19

374

35:39

60

7

Vertigo5.9

6.0

0%

SkinClub Worldwide
score predict & Analytics Insights
2 - 0
Résultat
2 - 1
1 - 2
0 - 2
Avantages des équipes

Cartes

Score

6.4

6

Vertigo-0.3

Manches gagnées

29

23

Vertigo0

Éliminations

196

178

Vertigo0

Dégâts

21.33K

19.57K

Vertigo0

Économie

1.48M

1.52M

Vertigo49350

Enregistrements Match

Record/Temps/Carte

Val/M

Établi par

Adversaire

Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte

  •  Ancient

134.4189

Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte

  •  Ancient

134.4189

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Ancient

00:26s01:55s

Multikills x-

  •  Ancient

4

Clutch (adversaires)

  •  Ancient

2

Clutch (adversaires)

  •  Ancient

2

Clutch (adversaires)

  •  Ancient

2

Clutch (adversaires)

  •  Ancient

2

Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

41.6027

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Anubis

00:24s01:55s

Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Choix & interdictions

Il n'y a actuellement aucune information liée à ce choix de cartes
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois

Dust II

80%

Ancient

33%

Nuke

28%

Vertigo

27%

Mirage

25%

Anubis

17%

Inferno

9%

Dernières 5 cartes

Dust II

80%

10

9

g
g
p
g
g

Ancient

60%

15

1

p
p
g
g
p

Nuke

50%

14

0

p
g
g
g
p

Vertigo

33%

3

15

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Mirage

100%

1

19

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Anubis

64%

28

0

p
p
g
p
p

Inferno

64%

11

2

g
g
g
g
p

Dernières 5 cartes

Dust II

0%

2

8

fb
fb
fb
p
fb

Ancient

27%

11

1

p
p
p
p

Nuke

78%

9

1

g
p
g
g
p

Vertigo

60%

5

5

g
p
fb
fb
fb

Mirage

75%

4

7

fb
fb
p
g
g

Anubis

47%

19

0

g
g
p
g
p

Inferno

55%

11

3

g
p
p
p
p
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Les équipes ne se sont pas rencontrées au cours des 6 derniers mois
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of FAVBET vs Grannys Knockers by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between FAVBET and Grannys Knockers, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Ancient, Anubis, Vertigo, and victory was secured by FAVBET. The MVP of this match was Smash.


FAVBET analytics

The team FAVBET secured 39 out of 75 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Anubis. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.


The standout players for FAVBET were Smash contributed 61 kills and j3kie contributed 54 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 29506 overall damage.


On the defensive side, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


Grannys Knockers analytics

The team Grannys Knockers managed to secure 36 out of 75 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for Grannys Knockers were MAGILA contributed 59 kills and Sidivo contributed 55 kills. 27728 of total damage by Grannys Knockers could not prevent FAVBET from securing the victory


On the defensive side, Grannys Knockers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date