0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Mirage (M1)
Records Mirage
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8171
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
21.75.8
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8171
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
16.45.8
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
15.84.7
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
31.3023
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
153.5
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of EYEBALLERS vs PERA by the Bo3.gg Team
EYEBALLERS on Mirage Analysis
EYEBALLERS demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Mirage were sapec, who contributed 20 kills, and Peppzor, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 7730 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, EYEBALLERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
PERA on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for PERA, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for PERA on Mirage included Ciocardau, who contributed 11 kills, and Bibu, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6334 total damage, PERA couldn't prevent EYEBALLERS from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, PERA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires