0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
123.4
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3415.0371
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
41.3055
Éliminations avec cocktails Molotov en moyenne par carte
31.0849
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
296.5798
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
69.521.6
Score du joueur (round)
38961012
Tirs (total/round)
8516
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of EYEBALLERS vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
Nexus on Inferno Analysis
Nexus demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Nexus on Inferno were XELLOW, who contributed 39 kills, and SEMINTE, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 13745 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Nexus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
EYEBALLERS on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EYEBALLERS, as they managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Inferno included SHiNE, who contributed 26 kills, and Svedjehed, who added 28 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 13001 total damage, EYEBALLERS couldn't prevent Nexus from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires