0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Vertigo (M1)
Records Vertigo
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
83.6448
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
13.52
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8064
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
21.45.6
Tirs (total/round)
8916
Score du joueur (round)
35211012
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov (total/round)
13423.8
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
8826.8
Informations
Map Analysis of Eternal Fire vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team
Eternal Fire on Vertigo Analysis
Eternal Fire demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Eternal Fire on Vertigo were woxic, who contributed 24 kills, and ISSAA, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 9483 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Eternal Fire held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Sangal on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Sangal, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Sangal on Vertigo included paz, who contributed 12 kills, and MAJ3R, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5633 total damage, Sangal couldn't prevent Eternal Fire from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires