0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Anubis
71%
Overpass
64%
Nuke
60%
Inferno
53%
Vertigo
46%
Mirage
36%
Ancient
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Anubis
71%
24
1
Overpass
64%
14
12
Nuke
60%
15
11
Inferno
53%
15
12
Vertigo
46%
13
17
Mirage
36%
11
15
Ancient
0%
0
48
Dernières 5 cartes
Anubis
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of Eternal Fire vs NoChance by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Eternal Fire and NoChance, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Eternal Fire. The MVP of this match was XANTARES.
Eternal Fire analytics
The team Eternal Fire secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Eternal Fire were XANTARES contributed 26 kills and woxic contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9194 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Eternal Fire held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NoChance analytics
The team NoChance managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NoChance were Fox3NN contributed 15 kills and Monkeylay contributed 14 kills. 4933 of total damage by NoChance could not prevent Eternal Fire from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NoChance struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires