0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Vertigo (M1)
Records Vertigo
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
123
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
17.93.4
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
7930
Éliminations par grenade HE en moyenne par carte
31.127
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
12.93.4
Score du joueur (round)
35971012
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Éliminations au couteau
11
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
12126.8
Informations
Map Analysis of Eternal Fire vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team
fnatic on Vertigo Analysis
fnatic demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for fnatic on Vertigo were mezii, who contributed 27 kills, and KRIMZ, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 10449 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Eternal Fire on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Eternal Fire, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Eternal Fire on Vertigo included XANTARES, who contributed 20 kills, and imoRR, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10255 total damage, Eternal Fire couldn't prevent fnatic from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Eternal Fire struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires