0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M1)
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:33s01:28s
Dégâts avec AUG en moyenne (par tour)
29.18.1
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2915.0791
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2815.0791
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:48s00:39s
Tirs (total/round)
8616
Score du joueur (round)
40921012
Dégâts (total/round)
47473
Score du joueur (round)
41471012
Score du joueur (round)
35071012
Informations
Map Analysis of Eternal Fire vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
BIG on Anubis Analysis
BIG demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for BIG on Anubis were mantuu, who contributed 30 kills, and tabseN, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 11310 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Eternal Fire on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Eternal Fire, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Eternal Fire on Anubis included MAJ3R, who contributed 29 kills, and XANTARES, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11674 total damage, Eternal Fire couldn't prevent BIG from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Eternal Fire struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires