0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Dust II (M0)
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
59.921.6
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2315.0371
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8064
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
41.4398
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
16.43.8
Assistances en moyenne par carte
15.084.3517
Score du joueur (round)
35971012
Tirs (total/round)
8616
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of Eternal Fire vs Anonymo by the Bo3.gg Team
Eternal Fire on Dust II Analysis
Eternal Fire demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Eternal Fire on Dust II were xfl0ud, who contributed 23 kills, and imoRR, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10723 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Eternal Fire held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Anonymo on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Anonymo, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Anonymo on Dust II included innocent, who contributed 19 kills, and Demho, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8660 total damage, Anonymo couldn't prevent Eternal Fire from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Anonymo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires