0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Mirage (M1)
Records Mirage
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
144.6963
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.14.6
Précision des tirs (%)
42%18%
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
276.5798
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
8021.6
Score du joueur (round)
34651012
Score du joueur (round)
35771012
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Score du joueur (round)
35801012
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Informations
Map Analysis of eSuba vs Copenhagen Flames by the Bo3.gg Team
Copenhagen Flames on Mirage Analysis
Copenhagen Flames demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Mirage were roeJ, who contributed 27 kills, and Zyphon, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 11113 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
eSuba on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for eSuba, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for eSuba on Mirage included Blogg1s, who contributed 37 kills, and sAvana1, who added 23 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11609 total damage, eSuba couldn't prevent Copenhagen Flames from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires