Espionage Tableau des résultats Anubis (M0)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

21

12

2

+9

112

5:1

7

0

8.3

+45%

16

10

2

+6

80

4:2

2

0

7.0

+13%

19

8

1

+11

87

1:3

5

0

6.8

+29%

11

14

11

-3

93

1:0

2

0

6.2

+1%

8

6

9

+2

66

0:1

2

1

5.7

+4%

Total

75

50

25

+25

439

11:7

18

1

6.8

+18%

NOM Tableau des résultats Anubis (M0)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

11

15

1

-4

60

3:1

3

0

5.7

-12%

10

14

2

-4

58

2:3

2

1

5.3

-9%

13

15

4

-2

52

0:2

3

0

5.3

-19%

7

17

10

-10

82

1:2

0

0

5.1

-23%

9

16

1

-7

54

1:3

2

0

4.7

-29%

Total

50

77

18

-27

306

7:11

10

1

5.2

-18%

avantage aux équipes Anubis (M0)
Informations
Map Analysis of Espionage vs NOM by the Bo3.gg Team

Espionage on Anubis Analysis

Espionage demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Espionage on Anubis were IceBerg, who contributed 21 kills, and Lucky, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7900 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Espionage held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


NOM on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for NOM, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for NOM on Anubis included dan1, who contributed 11 kills, and meztal, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5510 total damage, NOM couldn't prevent Espionage from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, NOM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date