0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
8.52
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
7.12
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
31.3052
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2515.0373
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Score du joueur (round)
38481012
Score du joueur (round)
44531012
Dégâts (total/round)
40973
Score du joueur (round)
50821012
Score du joueur (round)
37801012
Informations
Map Analysis of Espionage vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
Espionage on Inferno Analysis
Espionage demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Espionage on Inferno were IceBerg, who contributed 22 kills, and Lucky, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10356 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Espionage held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
EYEBALLERS on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EYEBALLERS, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Inferno included Peppzor, who contributed 25 kills, and sapec, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9055 total damage, EYEBALLERS couldn't prevent Espionage from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires