0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
5.9
6.5
Ancient0.6
Manches gagnées
11
13
Ancient2
Éliminations
77
89
Ancient12
Dégâts
8.77K
9.72K
Ancient952
Économie
476.35K
519.05K
Ancient42700
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Anubis
e
67%
Mirage
e
60%
Vertigo
50%
Inferno
44%
Overpass
43%
Ancient
10%
Nuke
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Anubis
100%
3
0
Mirage
100%
1
2
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Inferno
0%
2
1
Overpass
0%
1
2
Ancient
50%
4
1
Nuke
0%
0
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Anubis
33%
6
4
Mirage
40%
10
0
Vertigo
100%
3
1
Inferno
44%
9
1
Overpass
43%
7
2
Ancient
60%
5
2
Nuke
0%
0
1
Informations
Match analysis of esmagaB vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between esmagaB and DMS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by DMS. The MVP of this match was AW.
DMS analytics
The team DMS secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for DMS were AW contributed 24 kills and sFade8 contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9703 overall damage.
On the defensive side, DMS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
esmagaB analytics
The team esmagaB managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for esmagaB were Ag1L contributed 21 kills and PR contributed 19 kills. 8769 of total damage by esmagaB could not prevent DMS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, esmagaB struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires