0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M0)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec cocktails Molotov en moyenne par carte
21.0811
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.72
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
13.73.4
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
9.12
Tirs (total/round)
9316
Score du joueur (round)
37991011
Tirs (total/round)
9716
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov (total/round)
12023.8
Informations
Map Analysis of Enterprise vs Entropiq by the Bo3.gg Team
Enterprise on Inferno Analysis
Enterprise demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Enterprise on Inferno were fr3nd, who contributed 17 kills, and bajmi, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8128 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Enterprise held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Entropiq on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Entropiq, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Entropiq on Inferno included FASHR, who contributed 17 kills, and Buzz, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8128 total damage, Entropiq couldn't prevent Enterprise from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Entropiq struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires