0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
113
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
61.8064
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
19.55.6
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2215.0371
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
12.23.4
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
15.54.6
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
144.6
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
133.4
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
124.6963
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
48.416.7
Informations
Map Analysis of Encore vs VERTEX by the Bo3.gg Team
VERTEX on Inferno Analysis
VERTEX demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for VERTEX on Inferno were pz, who contributed 22 kills, and BRACE, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9188 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, VERTEX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Encore on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Encore, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Encore on Inferno included Hatz, who contributed 16 kills, and sterling, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6745 total damage, Encore couldn't prevent VERTEX from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Encore struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires