0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:29s00:39s
Tirs (total/round)
8916
Score du joueur (round)
34971012
Score du joueur (round)
36011012
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Éliminations au Zeus
1
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov (total/round)
9623.8
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of ENCE vs Eternal Fire by the Bo3.gg Team
Eternal Fire on Inferno Analysis
Eternal Fire demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Eternal Fire on Inferno were imoRR, who contributed 16 kills, and MAJ3R, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9275 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Eternal Fire held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ENCE on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ENCE, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ENCE on Inferno included SunPayus, who contributed 17 kills, and Maden, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7753 total damage, ENCE couldn't prevent Eternal Fire from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, ENCE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires